For
a very long time, the project of a canal linking the Red
Sea and the Mediterranean had been a very common idea, except
by Bonaparte, had a direct link across the Suez isthmus,
been envisaged.
Early
attempts were said to have been made to build a
canal linking the Nile to Lake Timsah during the
time of Pharaoh Sesostris I (circa 1960 BC) but
no traces of such a project remain, in spite of
Strabon's statement. The Pharaoh Necho II then had
a new canal dug (circa 600 BC). Work was resumed
by Darius
1st
(510 BC), and Ptolemy II Philadelphus who gave the
canal its definitive form (circa 260 BC). Abandoned
and chocked with sand, Ptolemy's canal was restored
during the reign of Trajan (circa 100 AD), but abandoned
again. In around 640, Caliph Omar ordered the canal
be reopened. At last, in 775, Caliph Al Mansur closed
the canal for political and military reasons.
|
|
|
| |
|
The canal at the time of the pharaohs.
(map from the book "Suez & Panama"
by Benoît Heimermann - Edition Arthaud)
see the map
|
In
1799 during the expedition of Egypt, Bonaparte asked J.M.
Le Père, ingénieur en chef des Ponts et Chaussés
to plot the isthmus in detail. Le Père mistakenly established
a difference of around 10 meters between the levels of the
Red Sea and Mediterranean Sea.
In
1846, on the initiative of their leader Prosper Enfantin,
Saint-Simonians (a group of following the ideas of the philosopher-economist
Claude
Henri de Saint-Simon) created an engineering company
to promote the project for along the Nile and linked to
theRed Sea.
In
1847, Louis-Maurice
Linant de Bellefonds, a brilliant French engineer working
in Egypt, carried out a technical survey on the possibility
to go through the isthmus.
When
Lesseps arrived in Egypt in November 1854, he found all
the technical basis on the place. But none of its predecessors
had had the political skills or willpower wich were essential
to drive the project forward.
On 30th November
1854, Mohamed Saïd signed a document
linking both parties.
At
that time, the viceroy of Egypt was the vassal of the Sultan
of Turkey. He felt it necessary - and Lesseps shared this
view - to secure the approval of the Sultan before starting
work.Both thouht that such approval would be obtained rapidly.
But a good lot of difficulties soon arose. First there were
British objections to the project and as a result, the sultan,
over whom the British ambassador has significant influence,
refrained from giving a positive response.
After
a number of attempts and many journeys, on 5th November
1858, Lesseps established the "Compagnie Universelle
du Canal Maritime de Suez" with a head office in Alexandria
and administrative headquarters in Paris; the viceroy approved
the statues of the Company and a fund was started for the
construction of Canal.
On
25th April 1859, Lesseps officialy broke ground for the
first time.
 |
|
 |
Engineers' camp |
|
Excavation work |
But
even from the beginning of work, all kinds of obstacles
arose, as a result of pressure exerted by the British and
the Turks. In one particularly serious crisis, in October
1859, Lesseps was forced to turn to Napoleon III who was
supporting his canal project reluctantly so as not to offend
the British and work continued at a somewhat slower pace.
 |
| Inspection during work on the canal |
As
from 1863, the campaign against Lesseps escalated, fuelled
by the prime minister of the new viceroy Ismaïl, who had
succeeded Saïd. At the orders of the Sultan, who was himself
taking his instructions from England, forced labour (corvee)
was abolished in order to bring the work came to a standstill.
But Lesseps then managed to substantially defuse the dispute
over labour, replacing manpower, thanks to engineers, with
steam engines, dredgers, excavators and other machines.
Begun with shovels, pickaxes and baskets, construction of
the canal continued under the power of steam.
From
17th and 20th November 1869, the Suez Canal was inaugurated
with great pomp and ceremony in the presence of Empress
Eugenie and most European governments.
| 
|
Inauguration
of the canal - supper offered to Sovereigns in Ismaïlia |
At
that time, 44% of the Company's capital was owned by Egypt
and and additionally, according to the statutes, Egypt received
15% of the profits generated by the canal, giving it a total
of 59% of the profits. This meant that the company was a
semi-public company even before such a term be coined. This
provided a probably unprecedented partition in favour of
the licensing country, a situation that continued until
1875.
At
that date, 1875, the Khedive Ismaïl was in dire straits.
England, who was not favorable to the canal, took the opportunity
to acquire, almost secretly, the 170 000 shares the Khedive
was forced to sell and so became the major shareholder of
the Suez Canal Company.
In
1882, on the pretext of the revolt by Arabi Pacha, British
troops landed in Alexandria and occupied strategic points
in Egypt, starting with the Suez Canal. They declare that
they had come to restore order, before withdrawing. As a
matter of facts, the British rule governed Egypt for more
than 70 years.
As
national feelings began strengthen in Egypt, the canal was
seen as the reason for foreign presence on Egyptian soil.
By returning the canal into Egyptian ownership would mean
returning to Egypt that part of the country which had been
lost. But nothing could be done as long as British civil
servants and Troops remained. In 1952, independent officers
seized power. King Farouk abdicated and the evacuation of
the canal zone began. It was completed in 1956.
On
26th July 1956, Colonel Nasser announced the nationalisation
of the Suez Canal Company. Egypt planned to use the income
from operating the canal to finance the construction of
the Aswan dam. In November of the same year, Franco-British
troops landed in Port-Saïd and Egypt blocked the canal by
sinking ships in it. The canal
will
be reopened in April 1957.
Following
the Six Day War in June 1967, the canal remained closed
until 1975. Since then, it uninterruptely remained navigable
and Suez Canal Authority has welcome ships from all over
the world and has respected the strict neutrality of waterways.
|